The drive to reduce wildlife poaching is not new. But turning poachers into jewellers is a new and creative one!
Friday, 30 November 2007
The Central Stastical Office produces useful monthly analysis. The November Edition can be found here. Inflation has continued a downward trend with the inflation rate for November recorded at 8.7 per cent. The November inflation rate represents a 0.3 per cent reduction compared to last month’s 9.0 per cent, largely driven by lower food prices.
Thursday, 29 November 2007
Zambia has some of the lowest tax rates in world - TTR world ranking of 6 and African ranking of 1. Here are some numbers for Zambia:
- Total Tax Rate: 16.1%
- Corporate Income Tax TTR : 1.7%
- Labour Tax TRR: 10.4%
- Other Taxess TRR: 4.0%
Wednesday, 28 November 2007
The BBC reports that Zimbabwe has achieved a new milestone. According to Zimbabwe's chief statistician, it now impossible to work out the country's latest inflation rate because of the lack of goods in shops. No formal market, no statistical figures, and possibly no jobs for statisticians. It appears that the statisticians are Mugabe's final victims.
Tuesday, 27 November 2007
Zambian Airways has joined a number of international airlines that have pulled out of the Zimbabwe route such as British Airways, Swiss Air, Lufthansa, KLM, and Air France.
Zambia Airways regrets to advise the general public that it will be suspending its daily services between Lusaka and Harare from December 1, 2007 because of continuing operational challenges on the route caused by high fuel costs and extreme currency fluctuations in Zimbabwe,” Nchito said in a statement. “This is a commercial decision that we have taken after reviewing the performance of the Lusaka-Harare route for some months. Regrettably, we see no prospect of improvement in the immediate future, and we have been forced to actIt appears that the withdraw of international airlines has not made operations on the Zimbabwe more attractive for regional airlines. In short, there's no "vacuum" to fill - Zimbabwe is now unattractive as a destination, period.
Monday, 26 November 2007
Reuters are reporting some interesting developments in Bolivia, where the Bolivia's Congress approved a reform to the mining tax code late on Friday that will substantially increase taxes on mining companies operating in the South American country:
Mining ministry spokesman Alfredo Zaconeta told Reuters the reform means mining companies will have to pay 37.5 percent of their income to the Bolivian state, up from 25 percent in the past. The decision will affect several major global mining companies working in Bolivia, including U.S.-based Apex Silver Mines Ltd and Coeur d'Alene Mines Corp.
The tax reform also broadens the scope of the Complementary Mining Tax (CMT) -- which acts like a royalty -- to include minerals that currently do not pay the levy, like indium and wolfram. Zaconeta said the royalty tax will be directly proportional to the price of the mineral in the international market. Currently, it ranges from 1 percent to 10 percent. The reform also aims to close a legal loophole that grants miners hefty discounts on income tax payments, Zaconeta said.
Sunday, 25 November 2007
Last month, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, an arm of the United Nations, and the Inter-American Development Bank released the first complete map of worldwide remittances. You can access the report here. The map compiles the best available information drawn from data collected on migrant populations, percentage of migrants sending remittances, average amounts remitted annually, as well as the average frequency of annual transfers. Central banks and other official government sources, money transfer companies, international organizations and academic institutions were used for reference support.
Saturday, 24 November 2007
“I am not saying that I will be the one that will be adopted. But the thing is that I have declared interest and that interest will have…like in any other democracy, there are votes which will be cast and hence I’ll prepare myself, present my portfolio, present my case, present my vision, present my capabilities and present my solutions to the problems. And then if somebody feels I am the person to be chosen in a democracy, then I will be grateful indeed......I want to contest the 2011 presidential elections on the MMD ticket. No problem at all, I will win.........I have been exposed to a lot of problems which I’ve participated in their solutions. And the 21st century is all about Zambia moving a step further, so much further than where we are now. Why should we be poor when we are one of the richest countries in the world.......Those are the issues which I think people do not see in Zambia. But they can see that when you are looking from the outside, you can see much better. So that is why I believe that I am not the single one person but I believe that when the contest begins, people will understand that there is only one person who can deliver these developments and take us out of poverty, and that will be me.....I’m currently out but in 2009, I will be back for good. At the moment, I will be coming back every three months like I am doing now......”
Prof Clive Chirwa [The Post 23/11/2007]
Prof Clive Chirwa now has the distinction of being the first person to ever engineer party membership in September and declare as a presidential candidate, for a long established party, two months later. That aside, what is important is that now that he has declared himself a candidate, he has also opened himself up to deeper scrutiny. Zambians must not be afraid to examine his thoughts and ideas. We must begin to ask the fundamental questions - what are his views on the pressing issues facing our nation i.e. poor health, poor management of strategic industries and weak institutions? What does are his views on the role market and role of Government in taking Zambia forward? Does he have the right qualifications for the position of President? Does he have enough experience for the job? Is he free external influences? Does he really understand the problems of a poor grandmother in Samfya living on less than $1 a day and looking after 20 orphans, because all her daughters died of HIV? These questions are even more important for Prof Chirwa, since like many of us he is not in Zambia everyday.
The response from the party hierachy has been swift and decisive. In a quote that is a close contender for "quote of the week":
“We have a structure to follow in MMD. You don’t just come from nowhere and say I want to become the party president and later lead the nation. I sit on the MMD national executive committee (NEC) and there has been no time the committee discussed Prof Chirwa and his joining of MMD.....I am afraid, this man (Prof Chirwa) will be politically bruised. This is a political game he is involving himself in. People will reap him off all the money he has worked for as a Professor and later he will even fail to go back to Britain......Yes, he may be well educated. But politics are different from academic qualifications. In politics you don’t need to brag. Politics will terminate his education and become a nobody within a short period of time. It is very normal and this is what is happening in the Zambian politics and Africa at large...”
Lameck Mangani [The Post 24/11/2007]
Friday, 23 November 2007
It is wrong to blame our politicians and civil servants for messing up and disrupting fuel supplies and thereby harming the economy. Why do I say this? Because government servants lack business and technical training and experience, and are therefore bound to make mistakes, or to act from political rather than business reasons. What is wrong is not that they mishandle matters affecting vital fuel supplies, but that they handle them at all.
It is often said that governments must manage certain key sectors of the economy, because these sectors are strategic. This has been said at one time or another of agricultural inputs, banking, maize marketing, mining, railways and the supply of electricity and petroleum products. All these areas of economic activity are commonly described as 'strategic', and therefore to be managed and controlled by government.
In reality, however, the strategic nature of these areas of activity is the very reason why government should not attempt to run them, but should leave them to be managed by professional people. The organisations concerned are then likely to be efficient and well financed partners in the country's economy. They will probably make substantial taxable profits, instead of hindering economic development and making huge hidden losses. In the unlikely event of large private sector businesses making losses, these will be borne by their own shareholders, not by the Zambian taxpayer. The change would also remove opportunities for corruption.
How long before we acknowledge that strategic industries ought not be run by governments but by independent and professional businesses?
(Guest Blogger & Kitwe Resident)
Thursday, 22 November 2007
The fourth and final extract from David Simon's report on Zambia , focuses on his observations on the fight against corruption:
Mwanawasa’s intention to make fighting corruption a priority has created something of a paradox for the Task Force on Economic Plunder and the more conventional institutional tools to be employed in the effort. Mwanawasa has sought to exert presidential control over officials and institutions such as the director of public prosecutions, the auditor general, the Anti-corruption Commission, the Drug Enforcement Commission, and the investigator general. While the multiplicity of actors may suggest an expansive effort to fight corruption, it also makes possible the politicization of the effort, in that Mwanawasa can focus on the body or bodies that he feels will support his agenda. Thus the Drug Enforcement Commission has played an increasingly large role in anti-corruption efforts, while the investigator general’s Commission on Investigations, which serves an ombudsman’s role in Zambia, has been largely absent from the fight. Insufficiently funded and decentralized, the investigator general’s office is an ineffective tool for civil society to hold the government accountable. Whistle-blowers in Zambia are not protected by law, a situation that may also detract from ground-up efforts to combat corruption.As David rightly observes, Zambia's supposed fight against corruption is currently an exercise in futility. Its not that fighting corruption is wrong, per se. The problem is that the approach to fighting corruption is inconsistent and a complete waste of tax payers money. It is a half hearted approach that does nothing to eliminate the fundamental problems in the long term. My view is that we should address corruption as part of a wider debate on what we think are the key obstacles for Zambia’s economic growth. And one of them is definitely a "poor institutional framework" – but an institutional framework goes beyond simply tackling corruption, it is about introducing stronger governance, greater transparency and accountability structures. Participatory democracy and general decentralisation is one of those things that have been empirically verified to work in increasing growth. To deliver these things requires political will and shifting power back to the people.
Wednesday, 21 November 2007
The BBC has a fantastic documentary on Zambia's mining industy. You can listen to it here. Maurice Walsh has been to Zambia to get answers to some key questions:
What is happening to the money that is being generated by Zambia's copper boom? How should Africa tax its natural resources? Are the forces of globalization forcing tax ever downward? How can a government survive in a country where most people don’t pay tax?The documentary has this interesting statement by Paul Collier :
In Africa you have some, quite frankly, governments that are not fit to run a Post Office and are facing the Maradonas of business sophistication. These huge extraction companies, that have money to hire the brightest and best minds in the world....its a very unequal negotiation, not just in terms of power, but in terms of knowledge.I know what Paul means but his statement is incomplete. The sad truth is that Zambia does also have the brightest and best minds just that the institutional framework does not allow these individuals to emerge. Until that is fixed, we will continue to rely on the media and external forces (e.g. NGOs) to push for a better deal for the average Zambian.
The Mine Watch blog has some interesting reactions to Magande's comments on the BBC documentary. Well worth the read. A short extract of Magande's shocking assessment:
"Everybody excluding those that know the facts. Out of the mining companies that are now saying they might be able to produce 1 million tonnes of copper by 2010, many of them are the ones that are investing their money, borrowed from outside, or made from other operations outside. When they are investing the money you don't expect that they are making the maximum profit. Maximum profit for most of these companies could be made 10 years from now. That is when we should be saying, look, these people have already recovered their investment, that is when they will be making full profits. That is when we can get worried about that."Update 2:
Another blog discussing the BBC documentary.
Tuesday, 20 November 2007
Magande gave a presentation at the Sub-Saharan Africa Conference in London this week. The video can be found here. You may need to register (free and very simple, with no e-mail verification) to access the video. The link also has video presentations by Joe Chikolwa (ZCCM-IH) and Victor Dingle (La Farge Cement Zambia).
Monday, 19 November 2007
The Central Statistical Office have been doing some brilliant work to bring to life some of their data. There's still some distance to go to get underneath some numbers, but their current work certainly bodes well for next year when the 2007 Economic Census and Zambia Demographic and Health Survey (ZDHS) 2007 comes on stream. I have particularly enjoyed their Monthly bulletins which combines raw monthly data with specific analytical pieces. Two pieces leaped out from the October Bulletin released this month:
I found this chart particularly interesting for two things - first, the staggering increase in maize cultivation between 2000/1 and 2006/7, possibly lends credence to the Government claims that its agricultural policies are working especially in safeguarding food security. Something like 50% increase in maize cultivation. That by any standard is huge increase - but let us remember that "area planted" is not indicative of output. The second thing, which illustrates the intrigues of data, is the last three years. Maize cultivation has virtually stood still, but maize output of course has gone up over the same period....hints of increased productivity?
The second chart looks at the incidence of poverty by province for 2004 and 2006. On average Zambian poverty levels have gone down. But what is interesting, is where they have gone up/down and how that compares to the voting patterns in the the last election. Areas that have seen substantial reductions in poverty (e.g. Lusaka and Copperbelt) voted for the opposition. Areas that saw increase in poverty rates such as Eastern Province voted overwhelmingly for the party in government. Either the poor in rural areas are content or the richer urban dwellers have seen a glimmer of light, and have concluded "we can do better!".
Sunday, 18 November 2007
The third extract from David Simon's report on Zambia , focuses on his fascinating observations on Zambia's struggle to decentralise effectively:
The government has espoused decentralization with respect to decision making, but it is not yet clear whether the financial resources to make it effective from a governance perspective will be allocated. For many rural Zambians, traditional rulers remain the usual recourse for addressing public grievances and needs. Despite the institutionalization of the House of Chiefs—a body of twenty-seven traditional rulers limited to advisory powers—traditional leadership is, at best, awkwardly integrated with the other elements of constitutional government in Zambia. The formal state is unwilling and politically unable to actively provide incentives for good government by traditional rulers. For their part, citizens may be wary of further institutionalizing traditional leaders, since for many the cost of doing so—potentially forgoing accountability with respect to private matters (i.e. dispute resolution)— is seen as greater than the benefit of increased accountability on public matters. Thus, the quality of local leadership in terms of responsiveness and the provision of public goods is uneven.Therein lies the heart of Zambia's problems. The problem at the moment is that Chiefs look after the people but they are not properly integrated in the system of local government. Crucially they no financial or budgetary responsibility. Everyone in the village runs to the chief for land and food. One of the great travesties of colonialism is that it reduced these institutions that served the people so well to an irrelevant spectator. The current framework of local governance has continued that approach and no wonder we find delivering local development (of whatever shape) such a challenge – we are constantly working with two systems (government imposed system and traditional functions). A way must be found where Chiefs can become meaningful - this requires both creative thinking and political will. I discusss this issue at lengthen in A cultural approch to Zambia's development.
Saturday, 17 November 2007
Professor Oliver Saasa clearly aiming his artillery on the bigger prize - the mineral agreements. The SCIAF / Christian Aid report seems to have awoken a new level of Zambian consciousness. Let us hope this new found sense of economic patriotism comes with some concrete proposals on how the mining resources should be managed. We need concerned Zambians not just to complain but propose models that would deliver a fair share to our local mining communities and the mining workers, while recognising the crucial role that foreign direct investment has played in reviving our mines. A future and more sustainable mining industry requires a model that all Zambians will accept regardless of the government of the day. This is what will give the foreign investors long term security and greater incentive to invest, not cheap 3% deals made over a bottle of Mosi.
We should push more for the re-negotiation of development agreements than mineral loyalties because we can benefit more from the development agreements. The slowness taken by the government in the re-negotiations should be of concern to all of us....Government should give regular updates on the re-negotiation process. We want to know what is happening....We expect to benefit more.....To some extent, the mineral loyalty is based on production; the higher the production the higher the benefits from mineral loyalty.....Within the next four to five years we expect over one million metric tones of copper. That is the expectation from Lumwana mine. Therefore, when we increase the output, we will expect the increase in the loyalties. So we should not be so disappointed with the current amounts of money from mineral loyalties. In fact, mineral loyalties are lower than development agreements, for me I would rather we concentrate on re-negotiating development agreements.
Professor Oliver Saasa [Post 17/11/2007]
Friday, 16 November 2007
The Post reports some interesting developments in Tanzania, where the Government plans to review the mineral agreements. Interesting to note that rather than rely on foreign experts the Tanzanians are drawing on all local talent and crucially an "all - party" approach. The approach is therefore an improvement on the DRC 'government panel' approach and certainly light years ahead of the Zambian government approach in terms of transparency and accountability:
Tanzanian President Jakaya Kikwete has appointed former Attorney General Mark Bomani chairman of the committee to review all mining contracts. In a statement issued by State House in Dar-es-Salaam yesterday President Kikwete gave the 11-member team three months to complete its work. The members include legislators from the ruling Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), opposition parties, senior government officials and the private sector.
I received some feedback this week on the Celebrating Searchers column, in particular, the recent article on Zambia Hope International. Now I don’t always publish feedback but I thought I should share some with you since it relates to the fundamental tenets of the blog, namely, free speech and advancing of different ideas, consistent with our Zambian way of life.
Keep up with what you are best at and do what you love most (New Zambia-real issues). ‘Searchers Zambia campaign’ may spoil the whole purpose, mission and vision, let alone readers’ interests. Simwinga, Musonda and private school woman in Lusaka mentioned in your articles are now using New Zambia blog to make a stand for their best gains. Cyber net mission lickers who have changed this once economically-packed blog into a beggars’ blog, ancient muzungu- wanga missionary workers forum. The pictures they display in order to trap the dollar are not the true reflections of most families in Zambia. Their families, may be! Look at Simwinga while in San Francisco, look at his family and the hungry agric show participants. What a contrast! Shame!
What about this 'Zambian Farmer' Adamson Musonda of Zambia Hope international (Tel; 001 301 624 0061, email;info@ZambiaHope.org)? I suspect he is alleviating the suffering of orphaned children by remote control because his Tel # is American and not the Zambian 00260, download attachment and see the child in the picture, ha! The nostrils are blocked, oh NO! Mr Musonda or the teacher should have noticed this stuff before the cameraman took the picture? Very unhygienic! How much should we pay the Musondas to teach orphaned children basic hygiene? Ba Musonda tata, benifye bwino. There are better ways of making us sympathise and give out! Awe bawishi, stop making such dirty impressions about HIV/AIDS in Zambia. This may be evidence enough to put off genuine donors. Even some of us' Zambian sympathisers may quit the queue. Donations in wrong hands!
Personal financial gain allegedly? Giving orphaned children a bright future is a wonderful thing to do. With money pouring in from all directions, one should not fail to buy nostril/ear buds, paper towel for such nostrils or ears. This child's finger or pencil would done the unblocking. NO, I shall not be duped by such Musondas, Simwingas quixotically using this NEW ZAMBIA blog. I beg to angrily disagree with this embarrassing promotional material by/for/from whoever, whatever, whenever, however...
My view on these comments is as follows:
1. The Celebrating Searchers column is something created by the author and is unsolicited. Simwinga, Musonda, Simutowe et al have not asked that I should blog about them. They simply happen to be Zambians I believe are making a difference on the “ground”, without relying on Government.
2. I am a profound believer in “searchers”. In as much as we have elected Government to take forward development on our behalf, very often better ideas start with individuals who take the risk and step out to make the difference. I passionately believe we should celebrate these Zambians, and more importantly, be encouraged by their initiaves to make a difference.
3. I accept that not all the searchers may turn out to be “genuine” or let me put it this way – some Searchers may be in it for personal gain and not the welfare of Zambian. Thats beside the point because the real test is whether their actions are beneficial for the greater good of Zambia.
4. If readers feel that certain “searchers” have missed the point, then you are encouraged to write a post and respond to it and enter the debate. New Zambia stands ready to not only flag up the post but have new articles that challenge other articles on the blog. So if you want to challenge an opinion expressed on the blog by the author or another reader simply enter the discussion! What New Zambia won’t do is pander to specific social and political ideological points of view. We are here to exchange ideas not to stifle opinion. All ideas are welcome no matter how contrarian.
Thursday, 15 November 2007
The Government has released the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) for 2008 to 2010 and the outline for the 2008 budget. I have uploaded the document here. I hope bad spelling of "budget" upfront does not cast doubt in your minds over its authenticity. I am told its the real thing! A few extracts from the paper:
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
The Blue Book of Zambia, pioneered by UNCTAD, which recommends investment promotion activities and minor legislative or regulatory changes, has won Africa Investor Magazine's 2007 award in the category of 'Smart Regulation'. You can access the blue book here. Most of the recommendations of the blue book are now being implemented.
Tuesday, 13 November 2007
Reuters are reporting some interesting developments in Ecuador, where the Governments wants the share of pie:
Ecuador wants to establish contracts between the government and mining companies, similar to deals the country has with oil firms, Oil and Mining Minister Galo Chiriboga said on Wednesday. "We want contracts that regulate the extraordinary revenues from these companies," Chiriboga told reporters. "They should be similar to current oil contracts." He said contracts will set royalties at a referential price for the mineral extracted, but like with oil deals, mining firms will have to share part of their windfall revenues if metals' price rise in the market. He added that mining royalties will be imposed on a "case by case" basis.
Chiriboga said contracts will establish stricter environmental regulations and boost the participation of local communities. "We need to sit down and talk because the current mining titles are insufficient for us," he said. Government talks will be held while the mining ministry works on a proposal to set mining regulations in the new constitution, which has to be approved by a government-controlled assembly.
Mining companies currently have no contracts with the government or pay royalties, but an annual ownership fee for their concessions.
Monday, 12 November 2007
Searchers are Zambians who are making a difference on the ground, and are not waiting for the Government to act. By this definition farmer Adamson Musonda, must count as our latest searcher. About seven years ago when HIV/AIDS took the lives of 10 of his relatives. They left 20 children to be cared for. Instead of taking all the children in, he started a nonprofit organization, Zambia Hope International . Zambia Hope works to combat the spread of HIV/AIDS through teaching responsible behavior to children, and has provided a local clinic that provides medicine to 18,000 people. Do check out their website!
Sunday, 11 November 2007
We continue with extracts from David Simon's report on Zambia . He has the following observations on accountability:
Notwithstanding the noteworthy improvement in the meaning and conduct of elections in Zambia, the level of accountability must be viewed in the context of how government works on a daily basis. Members of parliament continue to lack the means or incentives to serve their constituencies in specific ways, particularly outside of the campaigning season. At least in the MMD, the party’s national executive committee retains the right to determine who will stand for election in a given constituency, meaning that for sitting members of parliament, loyalty to the party leadership is often more important than service to constituents. Meanwhile, too few opportunities exist for most citizens to contact their political representatives, and lawmakers rarely make themselves available to constituents. Local government remains underfunded and thus unable to respond to constituent needs, rendering its greater proximity to the public an unexploited resource for improved governance......The Assembly should regularly engage with Civil Society and private individuals through open Parliamentary hearings at which the testimony of civil society groups and private citizens is solicited.
Interesting observations again, although I am less sure about the proposed solution. Sitting down and having a cup of tea with your MP wont make him or her listen to you. If the incentives always point to putting the party leadership before the poor person on the street, what hope is there? Incidentally, David solution seems to ignore the fact that most Zambians are too busy trying to get by, to sit down with their MPs when there is little of chance of getting them to listen. In the mean time as David noted in the previous extract, parliamentarians may well be constantly at the mercy of the 'economically powerful actors' .
Zambia actually has the reverse problem to highly democratic nations. In highly democratic nations, the problem is that representatives actually care too much about their local area and less about areas they don't represent. A combination of informed voters and local selection of candidates appear to put greater incentives on pandering to your local area, sometimes at the detriment of national causes. David seems to be saying, in Zambia parliamentarians simply don't care at all or worse, they only care about the party leaders! Just how do you fix a problem like that?
Saturday, 10 November 2007
This is a very good message to all of us that we are not indispensable…and those standing on the fence in the opposition, this must serve as a good lesson. We cannot cheat people by defecting from the opposition to the ruling party.......This entails that we as the opposition should work together to offer checks and balances. Clamouring around President Mwanawasa when you are in the opposition in the aim that ‘I shall be adopted as presidential candidate’ does not pay dividends. I would urge members of parliament to reflect seriously upon the very embarrassing defeat of Chimumbwa...
Given Lubinda [The Post 10/11/2007]
Given Lubinda, the Patriotic Front Spokesperson, offering a word of caution to those elected representatives who are attracted to the politics of poverty. Whether the parliamentarians /councillors will heed this warning remains to be seen. What is clear, is that for the first time we have a scenario where the electorate has helped enforce party discipline. I have always argued that the politics of poverty is driven by three things:
- Absence of clear policy and ideological framework within Zambia's main political parties. This makes it difficult for the party members and elected representatives to be loyal and convey a clear and differentiated message to the electorate.
- Failure of political parties to properly screen their candidates, due to resource pressures or poor organisational skills.
- Failure of the Zambian voter to make informed decisions - this could be due to lack of information on the candidates or it is costly to process such information given other competing demands. Lack of confidence in the democratic process may also increase the cost of accessing information relative to the benefits of making an informed decision. Why waste time and effort finding out who is telling the truth when the votes might be rigged or MPs may switch sides tomorrow?
The good news from the Nchanga bye election result might well be that if we can fix point (3) may be, just may be, points (1) & (2) would become irrelevant. The voter can help enforce party discipline and reduce the incidence of mid term switches.
Friday, 9 November 2007
Nevers Mumba has weighed in the Zambia - China relationship with a new article China - Africa Trade Relations - The Zambian Case. The piece is presumably intended as a response to Michael Sata's Harvard papers, which you can access here. The Nevers Mumba aricle has this interesting observation:
I must however state that China is not the only country guilty of abusing Zambian workers. When I was in government, I discovered that a lot of investors had no regard for set out regulations. My conclusion was that, we were failing to police our own regulations. One of the reasons for such failure is corruption. Those ministries and departments responsible for issuing work permits, inspecting safety equipment and procedures are usually compromised by these investors who have lots of money.Particularly intrested in the last sentence. For indeed, it appears that the threat of what David Simon calls "economically powerful actors" isn't just restricted to the issues of campaign finance and political capture, but also to other more sensitive areas.
Thursday, 8 November 2007
David Simon, a political science lecturer at Yale University, has written an interesting assessment of Zambia's current institutional crisis for Freedom House, as part of the Countries at the Crossroads 2007 survey. You can access the report here. Many of the issues covered in the report have been discussed on New Zambia many times. Nevertheless I thought it might be useful to extracts some of the most interesting perspectives offered by David Simon, especially since they have a read across to the Draft Constitution Specials and other issues we have discussed here. Here's is David's take on the question of campaign finance, which we have touched on under Sakism and When Hichilenomics met Sakism:
No rules regulate campaign finance in Zambia. A controversy arose during the 2006 campaign when it was reported that Sata, who had criticized Chinese investors, was being bankrolled by Taiwanese business interests. There was no public mechanism to confirm or refute the allegations, and the episode served to shed light on the need for better accounting of campaign revenues and expenditures. The lack of campaign finance regulation presents economically powerful actors with an opportunity to exert undue influence on Zambian politics. Innuendo aside, however, there is little direct evidence that any such actors have done so in recent elections.....The national assembly should enact a law that regulates campaign financing by requiring transparent and timely disclosure of all sources of campaign funds.David is absolutely correct that lack of campaign finance regulation is the problem and not as others have often indicated lack of public finance. Political parties are just like any other investment. If your brand is correct and offers a good return, people are more than willing to invest their money and time to make it work. If your brand is poor, no money will be forth coming. People and organisations are waiting to queue to fund political parties and this will continue as Zambia becomes an attractive place to invest and political competition improves. The key is to ensure a level playing field through a stronger constitution which would encourage a more level playing and increase political competition. Greater political competition should encourage investment in political parties. Those parties that cannot attract funding may need to consider whether their "political brand" is as attractive as it ought to be. Crucially, they should dedicate their energy to pushing for a level playing field through a stronger constitution.
Wednesday, 7 November 2007
Tuesday, 6 November 2007
The historical tendency for commodity prices to fall back after a period of rapid increases – and the trend decline in most of these prices over the past century –raises a question over the sustainability of the current high prices for metals and other resources. In response to the high prices, mining and energy sector investment has increased sharply in recent years, and it is reasonable to expect that there will be a significant increase in the production of base metals and other resources in the next few years. However, the effect of this investment on future real prices is difficult to predict. While increased supply will exert some dampening influence on prices, the rapid growth in world demand for metals and other resources appears to be showing little sign of abating. There are good reasons to believe that strong demand from emerging economies in particular may continue for several decades, although the adoption of new technologies could see a lower degree of resource-intensive output in these countries over time. Furthermore, productivity advances are still helping to contain the world price of manufactured goods, and a reduction in the price of some services is also probable as the tradability of services in an increasingly globalised economy becomes more widespread. While these various trends continue, they could support the continuation of relatively high real prices for metals and other resources for some time yet.A substantial long term shift possibly minimises the risk of government ownership of some mines in the future. Of course I remain opposed to government ownership of any new mines, as much would have to be done in developing appropriate economic and governance models to minimise corruption and ensure greater transparency. Zambia has simply not made much stride in this area to provide sufficient confidence that a government owned mine would generate greater welfare gains for the Zambian people beyond the paltry 0.6% royalties we get and the occasional charitable acts from the mining companies. I also think that better models exist rather than outright ownership e.g the model I laid out in a previous blog. What I am saying is that a possible shift in long term metal prices certainly eliminates the argument normally employed that government shouldn't take on this risk of ownership given the volatility in base metal prices.
A few charts of key Zambian metals....tracking the price trends over the last 15 years.
Monday, 5 November 2007
A while back I shared a paper by Jensen that demonstrated how fishermen in Kerala, India are using mobile phones to dial out poverty. Well now Zambian farmers are using SMS to search for better prices. Read more here. Incidentally it is a fascinating example of how technology can help deal with the challenges of isolated settlements.
Until the [SMS] system was put in place, farmers had very little knowledge about market prices and had to sell their crop to intermediary buyers at prices often well below market rates. With the new system, they can request the latest market price being sent via SMS for any given commodity. Within seconds they receive information on best prices and the best buyers in a specified province or district. The SMS service, which costs $0.15 for each message, enables farmers to compare prices and selected buyers to start trading.“The system is very accessible for small farmers because mobile phone technology is cheap. A SIM card cost $1 here, and a telephone about $25. If they can’t afford a phone, they borrow their friends’,” explained Gibson Kapili, in charge of the programme’s contract management and procurement.
Saturday, 3 November 2007
"We were told by advisers, who included the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, that not in my lifetime would the price of copper change. They put production models on the table and told us that there was no copper in Nchanga mine, Mufulira was supposed to have five years life left and all the production models that could be employed were showing that, for the next 20 years, Zambian copper would not make a profit. [Conversely, if we privated] we would be able to access debt relief, and this was a huge carrot in front of us - like waving medicine in front of a dying woman. We had no option [but to go ahead]"Edith Nawakwi trying to shift the blame on the IMF / World Bank, but only succeeding in making herself sound incompetent. The 'devil made me do it' has never got anyone off a crime. For indeed it appears that we came under pressure from young graduates at the IMF and World Bank who spent one week in Zambia and flashed a few models on the table and we crumbled. Full discussion of the Undermining Zambia Report here.
Friday, 2 November 2007
In the meantime, the DRC are marching on with significant recommendations, that may increase pressure on our government to take a tougher stance.
A government panel in the Democratic Republic of Congo will recommend 61 of the nation`s agreements with mining companies, including Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold Inc, be renegotiated or cancelled, the group`s chairman said. The commission will recommend that 38 contracts be changed, including those of Freeport and Nikanor plc, Alexis Mikandji, chairman of the commission for the review of mining contracts, said on November 2 in a telephone interview from Kinshasa. The panel will say 23 contracts should be cancelled, he said.You can read more here.
British Airways made its last flight from Harare international airport this week, sighting the worsening economic realities in Zimbabwe. The flight ended 62 years of service. You can read more here. It remains to be seen whether regional airlines would benefit from this move, since it will inevitably lead to more connections for Zimbabweans in diaspora (who will suffer financially). The scope for other airlines entering the market and filling the void on long haul travel is limited, so it is left to the hapless Government owned Air Zimbabwe, with a good safety record but apparently 'bedevilled by its owner that forces it to charge sub-economic fares and interferes by making political staff appointments and route choices'.
Always good to know what other nations are doing on this important issue. A reader has kindly forwarded the attached article on Thailand's recent increase in mineral royalties:
Mining companies operating in Thailand are grappling with calculating the impact of the Thai government's decision to increase royalty rates. Thailand announced on its Web site in October that the government had issued regulations to raise mining royalties on several minerals, including gold, lead, zinc and tin. It raised the base rate but lowered the maximum royalty it would apply to tin. But many mining companies were surprised by the announcement, which came to light after Australian gold miner Kingsgate Consolidated said in a statement to the Australian Stock Exchange that its production prices would be affected.
Thursday, 1 November 2007
UNICEF is reporting an important breakthrough in the fight against measles in Zambia. More than 2.1 million children, aged nine months to five years were immunized against measles during a week long integrated National Measles Campaign in early July. You can read more about this incredible success here.