After reading news articles in both the Times of Zambia and the Zambia Daily Mail on the subject relating to capital punishment in Zambia, and whether or not the National Constitutional Conference (NCC) should adopt the recommendation made by the Mung’omba Constitutional Review Commission on the issue, I have found it necessary to make the following comment.
There are many forms of crime which may attract capital punishment in some countries. These include murder, treason, economic sabotage and large-scale drug-trafficking. Without slighting the seriousness of other capital crimes, murder is perhaps the most deserving of the death penalty. A person who willfully takes the life of another person, therefore, commits the ultimate crime – a crime for which the death penalty is a fitting and well-deserved form of punishment.
There are numerous caveats which lend support to such an inflexible stance; let us briefly consider some of these caveats:
1) By killing another person and, therefore, violating the person’s right to life, the murderer dehumanizes himself or herself to the extent that he or she deserves to be expelled from the community of living humans.
2) People who commit murder in societies which have corporal punishment already know the consequences associated with such a heinous crime. For such people, the punishment is, therefore, self-inflicted; after all, it is a punishment every societal member can choose to avoid in the first place! Is it not immoral to protect the life of an individual who finds pleasure in committing murders – the ultimate disregard for other people’s lives?
5) It would be immoral for the government to collect tax revenue from law-abiding members of society, some of whom are kith and/or kin of murder victims, and commit it to the protection and upkeep of duly convicted murderers sentenced to life imprisonment.
However, the application of capital punishment calls for a fundamental redress of any apparent inadequacies in a country’s criminal justice system so that the punishment can be administered fairly, impartially, with reasonable consistency, and upon an objective and exhaustive assessment of circumstances leading to the commission of murder.
Unfortunately, such expectations cannot easily be met in poor countries like Zambia, pseudo democracies, and totalitarian states worldwide.
There is, therefore, a need for the Zambian government to constitute an ad hoc panel of local legal experts to determine whether or not the Zambian criminal justice system meets the foregoing expectations. If it is be found to be wanting, the Republican president and the Zambian Parliament need to seriously consider the prospect of placing a moratorium on capital punishment, to commute the prison sentences of any individuals who are currently on the death row to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole, and to decide on modalities for periodic reviews of the moratorium.
Over the years, we have heard calls by some segments of Zambian society for the abolition of the death penalty in the country. I believe a decision on whether or not capital punishment should be abolished in Zambia can only be made by the citizenry through a referendum designed specifically for this purpose, and after exhaustive national debate on the issue, not by the National Constitutional Conference (NCC).
(Guest Blogger / Agenda for Change)