Find us on Google+

Wednesday, 7 November 2012

Costs of rebasing the Kwacha

The costs of rebasing the Kwacha on businesses are becoming more clear. The benefits will always be less tangible. 

Standard Chartered Bank Plc revealed early October that the rebasing will cost it K5 billion in terms of systems and infrastructure upgrade. Part of the money will also go towards staff training in order to ensure a smooth transition to the new kwacha.  National Savings and Credit Bank (NATSAVE) revealed late October that it has so far spent K1 billion on the initial preparation of the rebasing of the Kwacha. The money has gone on reconfiguration of the IT platform and general implementation of the rebasing preparation in its 27 branches across the country. This is just for starters! A reasonable guess would be that the the proposal would lead to business costs over K1 trillion. Most of these are passed onto consumers one way or the other! Many Zambians have failed to grasp the simple point that most costs, if not all, of rebasing the Kwacha are paid  by consumers. Business will not simply take on the costs, unless the competition is perfectly competitive (and even then under only certain assumptions).

As for the benefits - there are no real economic benefits to society apart from "computational costs" to grand parents. In theory government benefits from reverse seigniorage - but that seems to be limited because Government will allow people to change up to 2015 in an effort to minimise "menu" costs. So government wont actually make that much money from the short fall in the old Kwacha exchanges for the new! Atleast we can say it is not intended to swindle. But it is still poorly designed.

It is sad that this was a purely political decision. No single economic assessment was done by GRZ!  This of course is largely due to the "blind faith" of ordinary Zambians in the ability of government to think through things. Too many Zambians are content with simply saying, "government has thought through it, so it must be true". It is 2012, it is shocking posture to hold that can only be explained by the psychological effects of the colonial legacy. More critical thinking is needed among our people. We are lacking this as a nation. Government is certainly not smarter than you. The reason no economic analysis was done in this instance is because it knows that real economic evidence will undermine its conclusions. As "intelligent customers" we need to hold it to account. Which of course is why this website exists - to give you the information you need, allow you to think through them and then influence the powers that be!

1 comment:

  1. its simple really.i spend i billion as a business as cost incured in kwacha rebasing,i will have to find a way to recover it and ofcourse i must fined a way of transfering my cost on the consumer"""??what??did you think i would spend that much for free?it makes no business sence.......


All contributors should follow the basic principles of a productive dialogue: communicate their perspective, ask, comment, respond,and share information and knowledge, but do all this with a positive approach.

This is a friendly website. However, if you feel compelled to comment 'anonymously', you are strongly encouraged to state your location / adopt a unique nick name so that other commentators/readers do not confuse your comments with other individuals also commenting anonymously.